Compare and contrast the responses of Japan, China, and India to Essay

Compare and contrast the responses of Japan, chinaware, and India to Western Imperialism - Essay Example china sort of made the rules and had the technology and was powerful, so they were able to fend polish off Western intervention for a long time. But when their defenses finally broke down in the nineteenth century, China collapsed. Japan fended it off almost entirely. Thats why Japan is the one area of the thirdly military personnel that developed. Thats striking. The one part of the Third serviceman that wasnt colonized is the one part thats part of the industrialized world. Thats not by accident (Chomsky, 1993). India, China and Japan demonstrate that there is a direct correlation surrounded by degree of involvement and village and ultimate success. India is the most colonized of the three It was largely controlled by the British by the 1700s (Keay, 2001 Chomsky, 1993). In the sixteenth century, it was already dealing with extensive incursions from Portugal, the Netherland s, France and Britain, and the Europeans eventually emerged victorious over Muslim and Hindu kings, with the East India caller taking much of the countrys control until the Sepoy Mutiny brought it under direct control of the crown (Keay, 2001, 250-500). India is a precise complex country A leader of the non-aligned movement, one that tried to balance between Communism and capitalism, Leninism and guiltless markets... (Khilnani, 1999). Nonetheless, it was in many ways uniquely devastated by colonization. It had burgeoning industries of large-scale sophistication, with good quality in crops and ship building and prosperity in many ways comparable to the Europeans (Keay, 2001 Chomsky, 1993). That was consciously destroyed. The result is that Indias rural landscape looks quite a different from that of most tropical ex-colonies (Keay, 2001, 448). Two crops were developed, indigo and poppy, across the country, and tea and cotton is still enceinte in Assam and Kerala, but in most area s, small cottages still produce without much capitalization or integration (Keay, 2001, 448-449). Nehru, in a review of Indian development, found a direct correlation between poverty and length of European control When the British premier moved into Bengal, it was one of the richest places in the world. The first British merchant warriors described it as a paradise. That area is today Bangladesh and Calcuttathe very symbols of despair and hopelessness (Chomsky, 1994, 56). Of course, its an important point to make that at least in India, the native population wasnt simply exterminated, care in North America. India is a growing economy now, but with a billion people, it is still nowhere near as prosperous as countries with one-fifth or less of its population size. In 2009, the get together States had $45,989 per capita, the UK had $35,165 and India had $1,134. For comparison, China has $3,744 GDP per capita and Japan $39,738 (World Bank, 2009). Per capita income variation among these three countries is thirty fold India was totally integrated and is now a Third World country China resisted to some extent and is a Second World country and Japan kept the Europeans at bay almost entirely and is a First World country. India was explored because of tea, cotton, indigo, and for the standard reasons for colonization A market for cheap goods and cheap employment (Keay, 2001). However, unlike many different colonies, India was also colonized to destroy its native industries so as to prevent competition (Chomsky, 1993). Meanwhile, China was not fully colonized, but major efforts were made